|
|
Hypothesis - Very Likely Theories
The Downpour:
Hypothesis already faced in other pages of this site
They are more than 10.000 years that the man it is handed down the image of a big catastrophe that goes under the name of Downpour. - To scientific elements that can justify this inauspicious event, the man has not succeeded in finding of it yet even if a lot of hypotheses have been formulated. - A lot of theories speak of raising of the level of the sea waters owed to the thaw of the polar glaciers, others speak of a comet passed in proximity of the Earth whose tail constituted by Ice has caused catastrophic rains. - We think all other thing and we see because:
- Breakup of the glaciers.
It is an no possilbe event absolutely under the actual conditions. - We imagine that for an any reason, the ices of the Pole North and Pole South they had to melt. - We premise that the water on the earth has had and it will always have a same quantity, except I bring from the outside of the system Sun. -
For the principle of Archimede; an absorbed solid in a liquid receives a push from the lower part toward the tall proportional to the volume of the moved liquid. - That this means? - That the water to the solid state, unlike any other existing element in nature, when it solidifies (Ice) it increases its own volume: For this reason, the ice floats and it has been and life is possible on this Earth. - We know that the two poles have different characteristics and particularly, the Pole North is constituted by sea water on which the Arctic cap floats constituted by ice; the Pole South is constituted by earth emerged with mountains and valleys covered by millennial glaciers. - These glaciers, in some zones it can also reach the three thousand meters while in the other zones of the Antarctica there is an ample expanse of ice that constitutes an afloat banchisa. -
If we hypothesize a thaw of the polar caps we will have that for the Pole North and southern banchisa, a lowering of level of the waters will be verified while for the Antarctic glaciers there would be an increase of the sea waters that they would have to compensate the lowering of the level of the Sea. -
Another factor that would exclude the hypothesis del'incremento of level of the seas exists and this is due to the Entropia of the water. - What it means this fact: In words accessible to everybody, mean that the necessary time to the breakup of the ice is superior to that necessary to the passage of the water from the liquid state to that solid. - So, if they have respected you read physics to them to today known, a substantial climatic change is not possible if the Planet Earth doesn't change its own orbit around the Sun. - This event is possible only if it varies the mass of the earth because of some meteorite impattato or temporary satellite whose mass has not been inferior to a fourth of that terrestrial. - We exclude, therefore that the cause than it has been handed down there by the history of the people is attributable to a climatic change. - We are inclinable instead, to account tener the hypothesis that the cataclysm to whose destroying cause is surely water, has been caused by an oscillation of the terrestrial axle caused by a meteorite of discreet dimensions but not such from to cause a substantial move of the terrestrial orbit. - We also hypothesize that this meteor is impattata in Ethiopia and has caused that that today Lake Den is called from which the waters of the Blue Nile flow out. -