Elderly

- Some Doubt - You Car Insurances -

- At times you/he/she is suited to reflect on events and events that verify each other and that one is forced to suffer without being able to do us nothing, but that then they force there to expenses obbligatorie, therefore real heavy tax that make us more and more poor and defenseless from this type of aggression. -

- It is the case of the different accessories that, with the obligation of laws taxes, have forced afterwards the motorists first and the conductors of motorette and motorcycles to equip of safety belts the motorcars and of obligatory protective helmets the means to two wheels. -

- Undoubtedly these components are profits and estimates against the accidents and the logic it suggests that any discovery action to protect must not be contested us even if his/her imposed cost can seem suspicion. -

- Naturally, to the employment of protective components it would have to correspond a relative reduction of accidents and damages to the person in case of left auto. - It would be permissible to suppose accordingly that the level of risk assicurativo is reduced and with it also the amount of the prize from to correspond assicurative to the societies. -

- It is not true really nothing. - The heavy tax doesn't decrease rather it increases more or less with motivations logics and shared by those people who would have to make the affairs of the citizen. -

- The Insurances don't care it really nothing. - They are protected and you combine in an only sphere of power that manages huge capitals of which you/he/she can do what wants, enough that the coverages of the policies " Life " is guaranteed by liquidity or immovable good. - And of immovable good we don't speak of it because with this mean they succeed in trespassing in other sectors as that real estate establishing, with theirs you acquire, thresholds of market that soddisfano demands of (probable) affiliate. -

- A valid contrast could rise from the Associations of the Consumers, but we has the suspicion that you/they can be there of the connivances also with these associations of category, or of the category of the victims. - This doubt rises because as it is of use in other sectors of the Italian public life, all it takes is asking; then search the dialogue that doesn't serve to anything else other than to calm the public opinion disdained by the manifold injustices, but that they find partial appeasement in the chatters that come there to art administered and that, however to the base they have a content previously agreement and to the unlucky cittadino is introduced as the result of a brave struggle between the parts. -

- We make an example: - It is asked (from chicchessia) an increase of a certain percentage, but previously it would be had to ask the half. - It seems that a contentious is born and begins each other to establish a certain climate of it throws and rubber band between the parts in predicate. - Sometimes and to make the more and more real negotiation, is resorted also to demonstrations of unaware city that are brought to also unthread for the roads of the capital city or him pre they build television debates in which the parts are cast the one against the others. - It is all false; the games have done. - At the end of the things it arrives each other to get a reduction than one of the parts (that party) it had asked and the gotten increase will be confiscated silently without then nobody says nothing. - This happens for the renovations of the contracts of job, for you increase some different rates to him, increases of the price of the fuels, the canons that should be abolished according to the European economic market, in short, for all. -

- As to defend? - There is not escape. - Is necessary to change habits and, for us elderly, to contest eliminating how much object of unjustified increases is and to pass word hoping that the new generations succeed to grabbing the connection of the things as were established after the last conflict. -

GA.NO.